More Pages: Winston Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39


Not by Sir Winston
American History scholars should have this bookGet deeper into it though and we meet Ulysses Grant, not as a General but as a failed businessman. We meet Sherman before he got his stripes. We meet Abraham Lincoln during the period of the Lincoln-Douglas debates, and the author takes the time and respects his readers' intelligence enough to get into the philosophical and rhetorical merits of Lincoln's debating techniques and the Republican Party's platform. The title of the books is drawn from a question put by Lincoln to Douglas at their Fairfield, Illinois debate. In developing his thesis on the Civil War, the author goes into great detail to explain how a desire for Liberty drove a wave of German immigrants to American shores in the mid-1800s where, as war approached, they displayed pro-Union sympathies. The author's thesis itself is that the American Civil War was not an indigenous event but was rather an chapter in an ongoing struggle between factions of the Anglo-Saxon race, a struggle between Cavaliers and Puritans going back to the days of King Charles I.
All-in-all, a book that opens the eyes to different ways of thinkin'. Readers looking for expressions of true equality of the freedmen or non Anglo-Saxon Europeans will not find these.
A great Civil War Novel -- Not by Sir Winston Churchill

Economic Solutions
It is a very specific book

"Built for Speed"--Vintage photos are placed strategically throughout the book (Richard Petty's 1975 Dodge racing at Riverside among them). Surprisngly, I found that many of the newer pictures seemed to have poor picture clarity in comparison to the older.
One of the books subtitles describes it as the "Ultimate Guide to Stock Car Racetracks". At best, it is average. Information regarding the races tend to be in-accurate (the 1986 Napa 500? Not quite. The Atlanta Journal sponsered the race through 1990, Hardee's for just one year, and Hooters took it until Napa took primary sponsorship in the mid-1990s.), however information regarding prelimnaries of most tracks, and early days provide a nice touch.
I gave "Built for Speed" 3 stars. It's certainly not the worst, but I've seen better.
NASCAR's historian looks at tracksAn admitted aficionado of history of all kinds, Latford lived through the entire first half of NASCAR's history and brings it to life for his readers.
Some reviewers have griped about the names assigned to races, but in following NASCAR tradition (policy?) Latford uses the current name of an event, regardless of what it was then.
If you're a newbie to the sport, or a hardened journalist (in which case you probably know Latford personally) this is a valuable addition to your collection.
As for the rating of only four stars, I don't think I've ever seen the "perfect" book....


Good But Not Great
Excellent short volume

An okay conclusion to an okay seriesAlthough generally good, at times Churchill's pro-English biases shine through. In a way, the whole set seems to be the story of a country growing up and the end is kind of a happy arrival in adulthood. It is interesting to read an "outsider's" view of American history, however.
The 19th Century: A Lively TripChurchill provides a lively and readable account of the great democracies of the 19 th Century. He starts with the years following the Napoleonic Wars and concludes with the Boer War. In between, he covers the American Civil War in some detail as well as progress in the other English speaking nations of Britain, Canada, Australia, South Africa and New Zealand. He also touches on other issues in Europe, particularly the rise of Germany under Bismarck.
I can thoroughly recommend this book to the reader of general history. It has whetted my appetite to go back and read the earlier volumes. If they should be half as good as this one, it will be a pleasant journey.


Shortcomings on ParadeIt is a shame that publisher and editor decided to format the stories into trite verbal displays of sex, and sex, and actually more or less meaningless sex. You get the picture!
Occasionally one catches a glimpse of what had undoubtedly been, at some initial stage, a gist of originality and personal human encounter. Granted that some editing has to take place, in this case the shortcomings on parade are entirely those of the editing writer, not the individual experiences.
These are supposed to be true stories - no doubt the kernel of the stories are - but having to read for the umptiest time about 'Spaniel eyes' and other overused descriptive terms in most of the stories, one wonders how much has been invented and how much is true encounter.
On the whole the stories would have benefitted from being left more raw, closer to their original telling, less manipulated and manicured.
Peaking from underneath this overly heavy sexual gloss and veneer is at (rare) times a true human emotion of what it means to explore objects of desire and what it means to author and reader alike being part in that exploration of individuality, will and desire.
Summary

Gracefully written, but lacking in focus."Red Hot and Righteous" tries to be all of these and more, but unfortunately it doesn't work. As a popular history, this is pleasant enough reading, but as a scholarly work it is maddeningly diffuse. Winston's thesis is ill-defined, she fails to address the existing literature on the Salvation Army, and she has no evident theoretical approach. While she addresses the power women had within the Salvation Army, as a feminist history "Red Hot and Righteous" lacks teeth because Winston turns her focus elsewhere rather than fully developing her discussion of women's roles.
Winston also uses a very limited range of sources. When presenting the Army's side of the story she leans very heavily on the 'American War Cry'--the Army's own paper. The 'AWC' was sold to the general public to raise funds, and it was thus intended to present the Army and its activities in the best possible light. For an outsider's view of the Salvation Army she relies overwhelmingly on one newspaper--the 'New York Times.' What about ethnic newspapers? What about papers that found their audience primarily among the poor and working class? What did the people the Army aimed its evangelical and charitable activities at think of these predominantly middle-class do-gooders?
Winston writes very well, and she gives the Salvation Army the respectful treatment it deserves. But as an academic work, "Red Hot and Righteous" fails to gel. By narrowing her argument and focusing on a specific issue--women's roles and leadership within the Army, the use of popular culture as an evangelical tool, changing depictions of Salvation Army women in books and popular entertainment--and expanding the types of sources used, Winston could have broken new ground. Unfortunately, she keeps stabbing her spade with too little force in too many different places, and as a result she only raises a bit of dust. While I would still recommend this book for a general readership, as a scholar I found it unfocused and ultimately unsatisfying.
Where do I sign up?

Scanner Solutions
Nice beginning scanner book

Good Introduction
Useful background to medieval philosophy

Software is 10 day trial version only
overall good examples, with exemption of option pricing ones
Great non-linear optimization toolWith his various books and software, Dr Winston really helps the business manager leverage his productivity.